Share it online

25 May

City HallThe headline demands we pick sides. Kingston Mayor Shayne Gallo battles with aldermen over ethics law proposals (updated)   appeared on the Daily Freeman online today.  The gist of the article is that Mayor Shayne Gallo and Aldermen Thomas Hoffay and Matt Dunn are disagreeing as much about the transparency of meetings and discussions regarding proposed ethics legislation as they are the actual legislation.  To quote the article, “Dunn and Hoffay have proposed an ethics law they say nearly mirrors the one Gallo has pitched. The mayor, though, says that the two are “vastly” different, accusing the two of including politically-motivated language that makes theirs unconstitutional.”

The real problem, though, is that we, the people, don’t really know what is in the legislation, and that information is difficult to come by.  With any luck the Mayor and the council members will work out the ethics legislation, with the help of the Corporation Counsel.  But, the general public can’t help without knowing what the proposals are.

I suggest that all proposals ready for public discussion, as written by the legislators, Mayor, or department heads, be posted on the City of Kingston‘s website.  The city is already doing this with road closings, some press releases, tentative assessment rolls, adopted budgets, et al.  Why can’t this be done with proposed legislation?  I know that before these items get to committee meetings  the proposer has written, at least in broad terms, what they want to discuss, try, and legislate.  What we get are brief glimpses into some of the highlights, usually after meetings have been held.  They come in drips and drabs from the newspapers, the radio, and word-of-mouth.  The last is most troubling, because it usually comes laden with opinion and slanted to the speaker’s point of view.

Is it also possible to add meeting agendas to the meetings schedule page?  The framework is the same, generally, month-to-month.  Those agendas could be updated as items are added.  This would be a step up from the usual “grab a copy when you arrive” model, and could save us some in printing costs.

Not long ago, I attended a Laws and Rules Committee meeting.  City Hall’s meeting room was packed past capacity to hear the discussion on the pending new rental inspection law.  It wasn’t long before the first complaint was raised in the voice of Alderman Matt Dunn.  Chiefly upset that he didn’t have any time with the written legislation proposal before the meeting, he chastised Corporation Counsel Andrew Zweben and Committee Chair Robert Senor, saying it was impossible to be prepared for the meeting with such short notice. I agree.  How can any of us participate in our government without knowing what, specifically our legislators are considering?

I understand the need for private meeting.  Not all discussion needs to be public.  The public must be allowed to work with their representatives, though, and we can’t do that from a position of ignorance.

Now is the time to do this.  Our city’s website is better than it has ever been.  Updates and searchable .pdf pages are posted just about every day.  Mayor Gallo and the Common Council are both calling for transparency and accountability to the voters of Kingston.  Hoffay said city lawmakers and the mayor should start with things where “we agree rather than where we disagree.”, according to the story.   So, agree on this first.  City officials post their proposals online before public discussion takes place.  The online versions of the papers could publish links to the documents, constituents can see what their representatives are doing, and we can all participate before the final version of a bill becomes the law.  Maybe Ulster County and the Kingston School District will get on board, too, and put some of those new iPads to work.

Kingston is getting better, but it only improves when we get involved.

-Andrew Champ-Doran


Posted by on May 25, 2012 in Uncategorized


2 responses to “Share it online

  1. Jeff Kelly

    May 31, 2012 at 11:03 am

    I personally don’t care about ethics legislation passed in an unethical manner by an inherently unethical process with likely no ethics behind any ability(if any) to enforce it.
    I suggested that the FIRST step toward “ethics” would be to give back to the COUNCIL the power to appoint members of the human rights commission, a process that was abused repeatedly by the previous administration, so that at least a bit more accountability may be divided between persons and that the Mayor’s power to stack such a commission with cronies who have less the mission of the human rights commission in mind than blind loyalty to the Mayor. Here was the response I received:nothing, dead silence. “Deafening dead silence.”
    Democracy is a nice idea only, sad to say. If we have elected officials that simply will not respond to us, then of course we can throw them out for someone else, but in this case, we have to wait two years before that can be done……

  2. Matt Dunn

    June 1, 2012 at 12:05 pm

    If you go to the May meeting of the Public Safety/General Government you will see that the ethics legislation is availabe online along with the Agenda. While I am chair of the committee some legislation, like the ethics legislation, will be made available online. This way the public has one more opportunity to view and constructively criticize the issues that the committee will discuss.


    Matt Dunn
    Alderman, Ward One


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: